THE alleged VATICAN’S SHAME SCOTLAND’S BURDEN Part 2: Could John Sweeney be related to Celtic Director Kevin Sweeney?

Could John Sweeney be related to Celtic Director Kevin Sweeney?

If you are new to this Story please go back and read Part 1 of this blog lined below

https://themanthebheastscanttame.wordpress.com/2017/09/08/the-alleged-vaticans-shame-scotlands-burden-celtics-father-john-sweeney-part-1/

If not carry on.

Could John Sweeney be related to Celtic Director Kevin Sweeney?

If you have seen what Father John Sweeney looks like there is definitely a family resemblance. I’ve been told to look into that angle as a very real possibility, but I think that task of fact checking could be left in the hands of someone more capable, that person is of course Graham Spiers.

What?

What are you laughing at?

No Graham Spiers would be the best choice for that task, well lets look at his past Spiers has a history -although not great and one that lead to his sacking- Of breaking so-called stories of Football Directors.

Cast your mind back to 28 December 2015 when Spiers wrote a column headlined “Rangers must uphold progress by resisting return of the old songs”

This coincidentally came just days after I outed him as making the Rangers Tax case first eleven an excellent feat as he appeared to be the only non-Catholic supremacist that made the line up. You can read about it in the link below titled BRING ME THE HEAD OF SPIERS THE BAPTIST!

https://themanthebheastscanttame.wordpress.com/2015/12/22/bring-me-the-head-of-spiers-the-baptist/

Anywho, the story he published was his usual one jaundiced eyed, Rangers hating fodder.

But he fucked up this time cause instead of just slandering and Libeling little auld you and me the Rangers punter he made the mistake of telling lies about a Rangers director.

That prompted a legal complaint to the Herald from Rangers, which led to the following apology below.

In a recent column for heraldscotland, Graham Spiers said an un-named Rangers director had praised the song The Billy Boys.

He also questioned the willingness of Rangers directors to tackle offensive behaviour, and The Herald and Graham Spiers accept this was inaccurate.

We acknowledge every member of the Rangers board is fully committed to fighting bigotry and offensive chanting, wherever it occurs in Scottish football, and that the club is actively tackling the issue.

We apologise for any embarrassment that may have been caused to the members of the Rangers board.

He also questioned the willingness of Rangers directors to tackle offensive behaviour, and The Herald and Graham Spiers accept this was inaccurate.

We acknowledge every member of the Rangers board is fully committed to fighting bigotry and offensive chanting, wherever it occurs in Scottish football, and that the club is actively tackling the issue.

We apologise for any embarrassment that may have been caused to the members of the Rangers board.”

So what better way of Graham Spiers trying to claw back any semblance of credibility to his rapidly ever narrowing career than to find out if Celtic Director Kevin Sweeney is in fact related to the alleged Sectarian, Sex pest Father John Sweeney!

Now I really couldn’t care less who looks into this as long as someone does.

The fact that I have had this story about Father John Sweeneys linked to Celtlic Football club -that I will be exposing further in the next blog- since the first day I first glanced on this story TWO MONTHS AGO and not one paper in Scotland has put 2 and 2 together and got 4,

Nevermind the new allegations of inappropriate conduct towards a young teen in the care of a man close to Celtic a club itself that is being investigated on allegations of inappropriate conduct towards young teens in it’s care. What about the Allegations of SECTARIANISM that have been placed at the door of Father John Sweeney and his Church?

Imagine if this was about Rangers not Celtic just imagine?

You think it would take 2 months and still no tabloids hell even broadsheets wouldve be investigating every nook and cranny of this?

Well I will give you another example AGAIN involving Rangers and Graham Fucking Spiers.

Recently there was a quite innocuous incident on Twitter below

that led to Graham Spiers trying to get the Rangers Chaplain, Rev Stuart MacQuarrie sacked from his position at Glasgow University.

You can read more about said incident below

https://www.rangersobserver.com/views/2017/6/26/graham-spiers-launches-disgraceful-attack-on-rangers-chaplain

On you go Graham have your say publicly on the allegations of sectarianism that have been made against Father John Sweeney a man closely linked to Celtic on you go…………I wont hold my breath.

If you are an avid reader of this blog and you cant see the double standards then there really is no hope for you!

You really are part of the problem

You must be living in a cave for the last 5 years hell forget that for the last couple of decades.

Just look to Yesterday and the Pull Peter Lawwell has on the media.

In the morning we get the sudden emergence of a private letter between the governing bodies in Scotland regards E.B.Ts.

And then in the evening just before Sportsound goes live Celtic Useful idiot Chris McLaughlan has the scoop that the SFA are quite rightly going to do nothing regards EBTs.

Really Peter Lawwell and his friends he has cultivated in the Politcal, Media, loony left wing Social Justice warrior and Religious worlds are not only a malign influence on Scottish football as was put so brilliantly in the Rangers Observer today linked below.

https://www.rangersobserver.com/news/2017/9/7/lawwell-wrote-to-sfa-in-august-demanding-further-action-against-rangers

Not only a malign influence on Scottish football but on Scottish Secular Democratic society.

You know what I’m not even angry with him.

He’s just doing what he thinks is best for his Interests.

The people I am really angry are the people on MY side. The fact that its taking TWO MONTHS for me to publish this and no one has picked up on it, no one.

And its not just that You can look to loads of things in the 5 years I’ve fought for

FFS!

When you see Ally McCoist Hold a bit of paper above his head with a list of players who liked a wee bet a day after I wrote the blog below

https://themanthebheastscanttame.wordpress.com/2013/08/21/always-bet-on-black/

after Rangers were yet again singled out and scapegoated.

That time it was for Betting which in their own words the SFA said was endemic in the game yet the first and the majority done by the Celtic minded Compliance Officers are Rangers players Then it makes you think.

Sadly that above is not an Isolated incident.

Well if that doesn’t scare you then it sure as hell scares me.

Get it into your heads THIS IS A WAR TO THE DEATH this isn’t play time and it wasn’t started by me but I’m as sure as hell going to play my part in it.

ARE YOU?

the alleged VATICAN’S SHAME SCOTLAND’S BURDEN: Celtic’s Father John Sweeney. Part 1

A Father John Sweeney made the news recently after being arrested by Police Scotland.

He’s not to be confused with Rev. John T. Sweeney the Roman Catholic Priest charged with the a first-degree felony involuntary deviate sexual intercourse against a 10-year-old boy pupil at the St. Margaret Mary’s Catholic School around the same time.

That sordid case marked the latest crackdown on clergy sex abuse in PENNSYLVANIA and is part of a broader ongoing investigation by the state Attorney General’s office into additional allegations of abuse by priest.

According to the grand jury’s presentment, the victim – while in fourth grade – was sent to Sweeney for discipline because he had been disruptive on a school bus.

The grand jury found that Sweeney used his authority and position as a priest, under the guise of a disciplinarian, to gain access to the victim and to force the victim to perform oral sex on Sweeney in a conference room next to Sweeney’s office inside the St. Margaret Mary Parish.

After Sweeney finished sexually assaulting the 10-year-old boy, Sweeney’s parish secretary brought the boy milk and cookies, the report said.

The Authorities in the U.S are looking into his employment history below

Associate Pastor, Holy Family Church, Latrobe (starting 1970)
Associate Pastor, Blessed Sacrament Cathedral, Greensburg (1975)
Pastor, St. Hedwig Church, Smock, (1980)
Pastor, St. Mary, Freeport, (1982)
Pastor, St. Margaret Mary, Lower Burrell, (1985)
Pastor, St. James Parish, Apollo, (1998)
Pastor, Holy Family Parish, West Newton, (2008)

Anyone with information about sexual abuse by Sweeney or any priest is encouraged to contact the Office of Attorney General’s Clergy Abuse Hotline at 1-888-538-8541.

Now there is one thing that is different between these to cases. Oh the names are the same, the FAITH is the same, the alleged crimes are of the same nature. But what is not the same Dear reader I ask of you?

Hmm?

Yes that’s correct one has his face pixelated and one does not.

Now both of these men are innocent until found guilty in a court of Law that is without question so why they disparity?

Lets have a look at the Glaswegian Father John Sweeney’s story shall we?

on the 27th of July the Scottish media published the following story.

Roman Catholic priest Father John Sweeney, 41 – who was ordained by Archbishop Mario Conti at St Mary’s Pro-Cathedral in Dublin in 2010- has been suspended from Saint Maria Goretti in Glasgow amid being arrested into his alleged relationship with a teenage girl and making a sectarian slur.

All the alleged incidents — including the sectarian breach of the peace ­— are said to have taken place at his parish between July 2016 and last month. The slur was allegedly made in October.

Sources said the investigation centres on allegations of “inappropriate conduct whilst in a position of trust”.

Last night, another priest at the church told The Scottish Sun Father Sweeney was “on holiday”.

At the time Cops said a man aged 41 was arrested on Monday 24th July -4 DAYS before papers ran with it- after they received a complaint.

Church chiefs confirmed Father Sweeney had been put on leave while police carry out the investigation.

A spokesman said: “The Archdiocese is co-operating fully with the police as they continue their inquiries. Father Sweeney will not perform any parish duties until further notice.

“Given that this is now an active case any further comment is not possible at this time.”

Father Sweeney had been due to appear at Glasgow Sheriff Court on Tuesday but was allowed to stay away while the probe continues.

ANOTHER CASE OF PREFERENTIAL TREATMENT IN MY BOOK!

A Crown Office spokesman said: “The Procurator Fiscal received a report concerning a 41-year-old male in connection with alleged incidents said to have taken place between July 1, 2016, and June 28, 2017.

He was freed from custody pending further inquiries and did not appear in court.”

 

Now if I was in charge of Police Scotland -and alot of you I’m sure would be glad that I was- I would be doing exactly what the Yanks are doing to their Father John Sweeney and investigating all of his previous history Fortunatley in this case we could then nip it in the bud before unlike the decade long periods of abuse we have came to find out about.

Since being made a Priest, he has accompanied worshipers on a pilgrimage to Rome.

Has acess to many children at different Schools throughout his parish.

He also joined members of the congregation on a trip to Krakow in Poland for World Youth Day last year.

Now you read about these sordid tales of Sexual and physical abuse with in the cult of Roman Catholicism daily sadly.

But that still doesn’t explain to me why the mans face has been blurred IN ALL OUR SO CALLED FREE PRESS IN SCOTLAND!!

We live in a world where Rangers fans are ‘named and shamed’ on the internet about their imminent arrest by National Journalist such as Alex Thompson before POLICE SCOTLAND HAVE HAD A CHANCE TO KNOCK THEIR FUCKING DOOR!!!!

SERIOUSLY!!!

Ironically Father Sweeney uses the same lawyer Calum Ross as the chap who’s door was chapped in the aforementioned tale.

Good luck with that!

Anywho I will endeavor to find out in the next blog -SOON- on how come this Father John Sweeney is receiving such different treatment than the rest of us. I will even carry on this charade of disguising his face in the Process.

Could the reason be that Father John Sweeney has High Friends in Low places?

 

 

OH NO POPE OF ROME, NO CHAPELS TO SADDEN MY EYE, NO NUNS, NO PRIESTS, NO ROSARY BEADS?. Part 1

Now nearly 5 years to the day, I published the first post on this blog which led to the fall of the United Kingdom’s most senior Roman Catholic, Cardinal Keith O’Brien. I feel it is time to reveal the ultimate goal behind this blog and the vision that was shown to me shortly after said post.

But first have a look at the picture above of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the second and the Bishop of Rome Francis the first.

Check the knuckle rubbing, tae!

There is a conspiracy theory by ex-Jesuit Malachi Martin that the people inside the Vatican made a deal with the Scottish rite Freemasonry in America and – I’m not making this up- enthroned Lucifer by means of a satanic mass through the telephone in Charleston, North Carolina.

As with all conspiracy theories, there is always a flaw. Because if it’s true & the Roman Catholic Church are in cahoots with Freemasonry, well somebody has forgotten to memo the Roman Catholics in Scotland.

Anyway I digress.

This picture above was taken on the 3 April 2014 Queen paid a private visit to the bishop of Rome Francis at the Vatican.

On all four previous visits, the Queen had worn black.

Here’s our wonderful Majesty with HITLERS Pope Pius the 12th

Her Majesty with the ‘Roly Poly Freemason Pope John the 23rd’ as Malachi Martin referred to him.

Her Majesty with the Bishop of Rome John Paul the 2nd at the start of his reign just after he POPPED up after the death of the Bishop of Rome John Paul the first. Who some say his short reign of 33 days was down to him being murdered inside the Vatican.

Bishop of Rome John Paul the 2nd who is about to be fast tracked as a saint but who fathered a child. It is yet to come out yet, but he did to a Married American Polish woman.

Another Tribulation the Whore of Babylon will have to face.

Her Majesty with the Bishop of Rome John Paul the 2nd at the end of his reign when he was sitting in adult nappies riddled with Parkinsons getting operated with a foot pump it appeared.

Now, why was our Majesty not wearing Black at this visit?

We all know she is a wonderful stateswoman and represents her Kingdom on foreign visits with utmost dignity and would follow protocol to the tee.

So why not this time?

The Wife and Daughter of the leader of the free world Melania Trump and Ivanka Trump followed Vatican protocol. That women who have an audience with the pope are required to wear long sleeves, formal black clothing, and a veil to cover the head, to meet Pope Francis in May of this year.

For all of you that say “oh it’s just stuff and nonsense” Well you are very, very wrong. These things are very ritualistic and mean a lot to people.

I give you the example of Privilège du blanc. A reigning Catholic queen or princess retains this privilege at the discretion of the Pope, by remaining a Catholic in good public standing, through marriage to another Catholic monarch.

Cherie Blair (wife of then-Prime Minister of the United Kingdom Tony Blair) caused a shit storm for wearing white garments when visiting Pope Benedict XVI on 28 April 2006. Blair was speaking at a Vatican conference on children and youth. Pope Benedict, hearing she was at the Vatican, requested she meet with him.

Malcolm Moore in Rome and Jonathan Petre, Religion Correspondent, wrote in the Telegraph that

Cherie Blair provoked surprise in the Vatican and the ire of a Roman Catholic MP yesterday by wearing all-white to meet the Pope, a privilege normally reserved for Catholic Queens.

The Vatican convention is that females meeting the Pontiff should wear black, preferably with a black veil, or mantilla.

When the Queen met Pope John Paul II six years ago, she observed the code meticulously.
Angela Merkel, the German chancellor, wore black, but omitted the veil.

By contrast, Mrs Blair, a devout Catholic, chose to exercise the “privilege du blanc”, usually granted only to the wives of Catholic monarchs.

Her breach of the protocol was surprising, since she has kept closely to the Church’s dress code in the past.

Mrs Blair may not have worn a hat to the funeral of Diana, Princess of Wales, but she mourned the passing of John Paul II in a mantilla.

Ann Widdecombe, the former Tory minister and a convert to Catholicism, was scathing about Mrs Blair.

“Even the Queen wore black to meet the Pope,” she said. “This shows that she has a very grand idea of herself.

“She is a Catholic. She knows what the tradition is when meeting the Pope.

“She obviously thinks she is the first lady.

“My message to her is ‘You are not a Catholic Queen, my dear, and you never will be.’ “

Mrs Blair was in Rome for a Church-organised conference entitled “Vanishing Youth? Solidarity with Children and Young People in an Age of Turbulence”.

No laughing at the back now

She was invited as an expert and remained afterwards for a private meeting with the Pope. A spokesman for the Vatican declined to reveal what they had discussed.

Sums that dreadful Woman and her Husband up, doesn’t just?

And I will give you the Black Pope of Jesuitism and the white Pope of the Vatican to take away with you for homework.

Anyway, back to the Queen’s meeting of 2014. It appears there seems to be some sort of monumental change in protocol The Queen herself could not appear to be arsed Turning up late then chucking the Bishop of Rome some freebies of a dozen eggs, a haunch of venison, six bottles of Coronation bitter and a box of Sandringham soap.

The spiritual leader of 1.2billion Catholics who seemed a little nervous as he welcomed the Supreme Governor of the Church of England was obsequious and servile.

‘You go first – you need to show us where to go,’ laughed Prince Philip as the Pope steered him into a private audience room.

The Bishop of Rome, in turn, presented the Queen with two gifts which had evidently involved a great deal of thought. First there was a facsimile of a 17th century Papal decree upgrading the saintly status of St Edward the Confessor, the Queen’s ancestor.

Also presented to her Majesty was a charming orb, not unlike the one which monarchs hold at coronations as a symbol of Christian authority.

Made of blue lapis lazuli, it was topped with a silver cross just like that on St Edward’s Crown, the centrepiece of the coronation ceremony.

Engraved on its base were the words: ‘Pope Francis to His Royal Highness Prince George of Cambridge.’

The proud great-grandmother was delighted. ‘He will be thrilled with that,’ said the Queen, ‘when he’s a little older!’

Now compare that treatment to the treatment that Argentinian Whore Mrs Kirchner got. Mrs Kirchner who when heard about plans for this royal visit, flew to Rome to badger the “Holy Father” over a three-hour lunch and then kept up the lobbying with personal letters – and also via Twitter.

She even tried to upstage the Queen the day before the visit by unveiling a new Argentinian banknote featuring the islands.

It was all utterly pointless, not least because the Vatican has always maintained a firm neutrality on the Falklands, and senior Papal representatives were happy to reassure the British Ambassador to the Holy See on this very point shortly before the visit.

Mrs Kirchner, when she met Bishop of Rome Francis, shortly after the birth of her own grandson, gave her a present for the baby – a pair of white booties.

I would love to have been a fly on the wall of Mrs Kirchner casa when she compared and contrasted the Bishop of Rome’s gifts.

The Pope also presented the Duke of Edinburgh with three papal medals in gold, silver and bronze. ‘It’s the only gold medal I have ever won,’ the Duke joked. Before heading a cosy lunch of herbal risotto and succulent spring lamb.

She still didn’t wear Black even in the time between the Queen’s last meeting with a Pope in 2010 saw the introduction of the Succession to the Crown Act 2013,  that means that members of the royal family who marry a Catholic no longer lose their place in line to the throne.

But the current prohibition on the monarch being a Catholic still remains in force.

Quite simply, she didn’t wear black Because the War is over the PROTESTANTS AND REVELATIONS FROM THE GOOD BOOK HAVE WON!

And I will be explaining that to you by the aid of the Vision given to me in the next exciting Blog.